Silenced Conservative Advocacy Group in Utah takes a Stand for Liberty!

Liberty Action Coalition Fighting For Rights In Utah

September 24, 2020 / Comments (1)

News Top News

A union was formed in July to fight for rights in Utah. They call themselves the Liberty Action Coalition. Let’s learn more about what they’re fighting for below.

The Continuous Fight for Rights in Utah

Although much of the country is supportive of both President Trump and our Second Amendment, it’s not often reported on that way by the mainstream media.

And despite consistent efforts of grassroots organizations to take on the tyrannical state governments stifling economic recovery across the country, it’s hard to find news reports on them.

Far-left Progressive and Socialist groups are much more popular on the nightly news.

What Is the Liberty Action Coalition?

The Liberty Action Coalition was created in July. It defines itself as “a union of individuals and groups committed to the U.S. Constitution and its principles.”


Raven_Steel_Ad-05

They have organized a rally protesting mandated masks for K-12 school children in Utah, counter-protested Black Lives Matter demonstrations, and now organized a Tactical Parade on September 17.

About 75 vehicles participated in the parade, traveling roughly 10 miles throughout St. George, Utah. They honked their horns, waved American flags, displayed their firearms, and showed support for President Trump’s reelection.

The parade began at Washington City’s Veterans Park at 6 p.m., with a planned trip across St. George to Canyon View Park in Santa Clara.

Upon arrival in Santa Clara, several members of the group spoke to a crowd of 120 attendees about the importance and the meaning of the United States Constitution.

Larry Meyers, the group’s treasurer, described the Constitution as being written by “some of the greatest men who ever lived on this earth.”

USPATRIOTGEAR TSHIRT
Free Outlaw Hat

Their Involvement with Schools

The topic then shifted to the public school mask requirement, with encouragement to email Utah Governor Gary Herbert on the subject.

The Coalition is also vocal about opposing mandatory vaccines for school children.

Earlier this month, the group officially endorsed three write-in candidates for the Washington County School Board.

The candidates, Sadie Lee Pulsipher in District 1, Larry Meyers in District 2, and Dave Shaw in District 3, have all promised to fight Gov. Herbert’s mask mandate.

The Coalition Reminding Citizens About Their Rights

In 2004, September 17 was federally designated as Constitution Day and Citizenship Day to commemorate the signing of the U.S. Constitution in Philadelphia on September 17, 1787.

We continue to celebrate Constitution Day because the historic document, along with its bill of Rights, is the legal means by which “We the People” ensure that the government serves its vital purposes without violating our rights.

Constitution Day was the perfect symbolic day for the Liberty Action Coalition. It was an opportunity to meet and remind citizens that our modern-day government has violated our rights in 2020.

Before we concede any more of our God-given rights, let us be reminded that America has our Constitution to thank for all that we have become.

As Calvin Coolidge once said, “To live under the American Constitution is the greatest political privilege that was ever accorded to the human race.”

“The American dream comes from opportunity. The opportunity comes from our founding principles, our core values that are held together and protected by the Constitution. Those ideas are neither Republican, Democrat, conservative, liberal, white, or black. Those are American ideologies.” – Ted Yoho, Florida Representative

What do you think of the Liberty Action Coalition? Do you agree or disagree with the way they fight for rights in Utah? We’d love to hear from you in the comments section!

Up Next:

Feature Image via Facebook/Janie McDade Hawley

One Response to :
Silenced Conservative Advocacy Group in Utah takes a Stand for Liberty!

  1. Charles Horne says:

    Has SCOTUS (all but Justices Thomas & Alito) gone Rogue and lost “Standing” as Americans?

    YOU BE THE JUDGE!

    Supreme Court “No Standing Order”

    To Texas, et al.

    The first paragraph of the order states: “The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.”

    U.S. Constitution: Article III

    Section 2.

    The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, (and) the laws of the United States, …; –to controversies to which the United States shall be a party; –to controversies between two or more states;–between a state and citizens of another state;–between citizens of different states;…

    In all cases … in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.

    Like this “EXCEPTION” for example: (28 U.S. Code sub-section 1251)

    · a) The Supreme Court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction of all controversies between two or more States.

    But this Court proclaims they don’t have “Standing” meaning no legitimacy to appear before them. Outrages!

    Click HERE to see all the Federal Jurisdiction listings.

    Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses

    C. FEDERAL JURISDICTION The federal government asserts jurisdiction over an election offense to ensure that basic rights of United States citizenship, and a fundamental process of representative democracy, remain uncorrupted. … The ultimate goal is to move up the ladder of culpability to candidates, political operatives, public officials, and others who attempted to corrupt, or did corrupt, the public office involved.

    Federal jurisdiction over election fraud is easily established in elections when a federal candidate is on the ballot. The mere listing of a federal candidate’s name on a ballot is sufficient under most of the federal statutes used to prosecute voter fraud to satisfy federal jurisdiction. … In such cases,

    the federal interest is based on the presence of a federal candidate, whose election may be tainted, or appear tainted, by the fraud, a potential effect that Congress has the constitutional authority to regulate under Article I, Section 2, clause 1; Article I, Section 4, clause 1; Article II, Section 1, clause 2; and the Seventeenth Amendment.

    2. Statutes Applicable to Federal Elections The following additional statutes apply to federal (including “mixed”) elections, …:

    · 15 • 18 U.S.C. § 594 – intimidation of voters;

    · 18 U.S.C. § 597 – payments to vote, or to refrain from voting, for a federal candidate;

    · 18 U.S.C. § 608(b) – vote buying and false registration under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act;

    · 18 U.S.C. § 611 – voting by aliens;

    · 42 U.S.C. § 1973i(c) – payments for registering to vote or voting, fraudulent registrations, and conspiracies to encourage illegal voting;

    · 42 U.S.C. § 1973i(e) – multiple voting;

    · 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg-10(1) – voter intimidation;

    · 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg-10(2) – fraudulent voting or registering

    Clearly Justices Thomas and Alito are aware of these laws as they publicly declared in their dissent that the Court has “an obligation to hear the petition”.

    · Is it conceivable that the ‘Infidel 7’ are not aware of their “legal obligation”?

    · What is their motivation then, knowing what their “legal obligation” is?

    · Isn’t it “allegedly” crystal clear that this action by the ‘Infidel 7’ was an act of Seditious Conspiracy? (see below)

    18 U.S.C. § 2384 – U.S. Code Seditious conspiracy

    1. If two or more persons … in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to … prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, …, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

    Does Thomas Jefferson’s prediction continue to be fulfilled? “It has long, …been my opinion, and I have never shrunk from its expression …that the germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the constitution of the federal judiciary; …working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped.”

    The law applies to everyone

    Perhaps one of the defining features of the rule of law is that, under such a system, the law is applied equally to all citizens, including the lawmakers themselves. Rule of law simply means that the law itself, rather than individuals or organizations, reigns supreme. Therefore, even people who enforce and administer the law, such as police officers, judges, and lawyers, are still subject to the same laws as everybody else is.

    Proposed Action Plan

    1. Appeal to Conservative Utahans to embrace these Constitutional principles to help save America.

    2. Meet with Senator Mike Lee representing these 100s/1000s of his constituents and see if he will come on board.

    3. Meet with Attorney General Reyes and persuade him to invite the Texas AG and the other State AG’s that were rebuffed by SCOTUS, to make their fraudulent election proofs to the Utah Supreme Court, for a confirmation of validity and harm to the State of Utah.

    4. Grow the list of supportive AGs through similar processes as necessary.

    5. Then with the support of potentially 43 States represented file again with SCOTUS to, under the rules of law (see Hamilton #65 below) review the proofs, in an open to the public virtual forum and render their “rule of law” judgement as to the validity thereof.

    The Federalist Papers

    Hamilton #65

    “… The punishment which may be the consequence of conviction upon impeachment, is not to terminate the chastisement of the offender. After having been sentenced to a perpetual ostracism from the esteem and confidence, and honors and emoluments of his country, he will still be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law.”

    “No one is above the law”

    If you agree, please pass this on!

    Publius II

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

[email]
[email]